An Essay on "Frequencies." A movie directed by Darren Paul Fisher.

“Knowledge determines destiny,” the phrase that surrounds the concepts and ideals set in writer-director Darren Fishers Orwellian love story, “Frequencies.” Formally called “The OXV Manuel,” this story is set in a world where each individual gives off a certain frequency that determines his or hers “luck” or probability of success in life. Those who give off a low frequency are more susceptible to being in the wrong place at the wrong time, as well as having extreme amounts of empathy and feeling. However those with high frequencies, operate much as a machine would, lacking emotion and valuing logic and reason over the ability to feel. The story’s two main characters, Zak and Marie, are the polar opposites and poster children for each extreme end of the frequency spectrum. Zak is a low frequency boy love stricken by the high frequency and emotionless girl, Marie.  When around each other for more than a minute, nature responds to their difference in frequency by exhibiting forms of chaos, thus rendering them, incompatible. Grief ridden Zak dedicates his life to finding a way to be with Marie. Consulting the help from his center frequency aligned friend Theodore, Zak finds various temporary solutions to stretch the one minute time barrier for he and Maries encounters. In short, Zak and Theodore create a device that is able to read the frequency of any given person and convert the data into what they found temporarily balanced two peoples frequencies, words. Two syllable, often meaningless words that can bring two frequencies to equality. This gives Marie the chance to feel for the first time, and the two subsequently fall in love. However, this invention or solution does not come without a side effect. Coming in groups of three, the given words generated by the device hold the ability to also control a person’s actions. This puts the love between Zak and Marie in question, as well as the entire future of humanity.

“Frequencies,” is a movie that pushes us to examine the themes of individualism and social acceptance in our everyday lives. Wherein the movie never explains why the world is the way it is, what the outcome of World War Two was, or what form of government is in power at the time. The movie does give us hints. For instance, there is little to no presence of any other race other than white Caucasian and the government appears to be a subversive form of totalitarianism. With the existence of a “Ministry of Partnership” and a social caste system based off of people’s frequencies, the world seems similar to the dystopian environments found in novels by Philip K Dick or most notably, George Orwell.  The social norm according to Fisher’s script is one based entirely on luck. A high frequency individual will likely never wait for a train, knock over a glass, or fall randomly ill, and upon discovering any threat to this social standard, the government steps in to subdue it. As best seen when Zak discovers the ability to balance frequencies. However, once the side effect of motion control surfaces, the government appears to favor keeping society the way it is rather than utilizing it for their own benefit. In many ways, this entire ideal mirrors aspects of today’s society. Our way of life is defined by how much money we have, how many friends we have, our accomplishments and failures, and our ability to succeed in life. Rather than having one defining notion (frequency), we have a plethora of ideals to be subjected to. Herein lays the main difference between our world and the world of Darren Fisher’s “Frequencies.” Nonetheless, today we still see the push for defining the soul, free will, and the cause and effects we have towards nature.

After learning of the side effect to Zak’s solution to human frequency, Marie begins to feel as if Zak used the generated words to direct her free will and selfishly make her fall in love with him. In an attempt to alter and set true what was believed to be false, Marie forces Zak to say a generated word then command her not to love him. He reluctantly complies, however there is no apparent change with Marie’s emotions towards him. In search of deeper answers and discovering music’s link to human frequency, Zak reaches out to Theodore’s father whom is a talented pianist and music enthusiast.  He explains to Zak that when music is played, it instantly equalizes people’s frequency. The vibrations of multiple sound waves disrupt the frequencies allowing everyone to exist on an equal plane. He goes on to explain that music is the ‘reset button’ for our way of life. Theodore later manages to uncover a pattern with music itself and finds a way to predict when certain events will occur.

Upon reading articles from the New York Times as well as the website, Film School Rejects.com, I have found that the ending of the movie can be open for interpretation, where it appears that Theodore has mastered some form of control over the physical world, perhaps even time itself.  Theodore’s apparent discovery, Zak and Marie’s love, and the effect of music towards frequency all seem to contradict or support aspects of the argument of free will. Were Marie and Zak destined to be together? Are we all just complex machines with no purpose? Is the world merely a canvas that anyone can manipulate? These are all very real questions we ask in today’s world. With the use of science and religion often being at the center of debate, we as a race are in constant search for the ability to define that which makes us human.

In conclusion, the film “Frequencies,” is a very raw and rather unique take on addressing questions we ask each day. It shows us a world where things are far more controlled and masked. Yet argues that love can transcend any bound or obstacle, it shows us that free will is possible, and that spontaneity provides the color to an otherwise mechanical world. Proving that free will does in fact exist, yet the movie reverts on this and conveys a last minute notion of doubt. The very dreadful thought that maybe we are all just 0s and 1s in a world based solely off patterns and defined sequence. The final message I received from viewing this intellectually rich film, was to analyze my own humanity, my own way of life and draw a conclusion. That which I have done and can never be happier with the “data” I myself have collected.   

watch the trailer, here.

A Subversive Transformation: Timeline of Knights Templar/Freemason Ideology

First Crusade: 1095–1099

1119 - 1312 AD: Knights Templar in existence

Second Crusade: 1147–1149

Third Crusade: 1187–1192

1190 - 1250 AD: The Templars begin to practice occult and mystical ideology under themes of Gnosticism.

Ninth Crusade: 1270–1272 (Last official Crusade)

1291: Templars pushed back by Muslims to Tortosa, Syria and later Cyprus

13 October 1307: Templars arrested and burned at the stake by order of Pope Clement V and King Phillip IV of France. Accused of heresy. However, not all are killed or imprisoned.

Templars burning at the stake

1362 AD: Kensington Stone erected in Minnesota by acclaimed Norse men claiming a slaughter of their men (by natives?). Supposed to be written by a Templar Monk traveling with the party (as was usual for expeditions to encourage spiritual moral) for the sole purpose of claiming land in the name of the Templars (note the location is not far from Winnipeg, as well as the coded hooked "X" engraved on the stone, which was the land claim itself). The Templars were most likely aware of Norse expeditions and used them to travel beyond Europe to establish a new colony and escape extinction.

Oak Island, Nova Scotia

Circa 1400: Voyage by Henry Sinclair to the New World. Most likely to verify and establish the Templar Colony. As well as (proposed) to transport either the Holy Grail, Ark of the Covent, or what remained of the Templar wealth (most likely the later). The Money Pit on Oak Island, Nova Scotia, is supposedly the burial location where Sinclair laid any one (or all) of these treasures to rest.

20 September 1456: Rosslyn Chapel constructed by William Sinclair (Henry Sinclair's grandson). This was intended to be a "map" for isolated Templars who were in search of the New World and the new Templar land claim. As well as a safe guard for Templar relicts. (Vault underneath the church). 

1635 - 1698 AD (possibly circa 1390): Newport Tower in modern day Rhode Island is built by reformed Templars to secretly point towards their land claim in the mid west. For the sole purpose of guiding knights from Europe towards their new "home," upon reaching the new world.

circa 1500 - 1700 AD: During the Renaissance, Templars in North America as well as those living subversively in Europe, begin to intertwine with early forms of freemasonry. Therefore shaping modern mason doctrine.  

May 1776 AD: Adam Weishaupt founds the illuminati based off Templar, occult, and gnostic theology. (Note: The freemasons in America at the time, as well as freemasonry itself, was not yet corrupted by Weishaupt's ideology). 

1790 - 1840 AD: Freemasonry and the illuminati ideology begin to become one in the same. This was after Weishaupt saw Masonry as the perfect vessel to spread his teachings due to its rich Templar history. Some will even say this is because Weishaupt's adopted father, Jesuit/Templar Baron Ickstatt, raised young Adam in the teachings of the order.

1848 AD: The French revolution is instigated by illuminated freemasons. Proving to be the first documented event orchestrated by the society.

Circa 1860: Templar, Occult, Gnostic, and Illuminated theology are now under one banner, Freemasonry. 

1872 AD: Albert Pike writes and publishes Morals and Dogma, often called the illuminated freemason bible.

Winnipeg: Geographical center of
North America

1913 - 1920 AD: Construction of the Manitoba Legislative Building in Winnipeg by the Masons (Solomon's Rebuilt Temple). It lays roughly on the geographical center of North America, most likely an attempt to utilize "lay line" energy. It is my belief that this will be the future capitol of the world.

2000 - present day: Freemasons orchestrating events that will lead to a totalitarian, Zionist, science state.

Vibrative Relations: A Theory on Astrological Evidence

    

     Lately in my life, the questions and topics of the astrological signs have become more prevalent. Whether it's the annoying but addicting Facebook reposts of "What signs do this/what signs do that..." or the apps designed to guide your relationship with the other signs, we can all agree that the zodiacal signs are now a heavily influential part of our society.



    But what exactly are they? I have poured over the topics, looking deeply into the zodiac's past and found that most ancient cultures all abided by the zodiac in some way, shape, or form. Even the Jewish temple in Israel has the signs incorporated into its foundation. My first thoughts were that the signs exist for the sole purpose of defining and better understanding ourselves, however after researching the Egyptians and Canaanites (even some Sumerian influence), I have become led to believe that these cultures understood the position of the sun and it's effect on the nature of humanity. Meaning this: If an ancient civilization was in need of more soldiers, politicians, farmers, etc a mother and father could use the position of the sun and the knowledge that people born during certain seasons had certain personality traits, to conceive a child bred for a certain purpose. For instance winter signs (Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn) are often associated with being practical and sturdy leaders, whereas Spring signs see more social and feeling individuals (Aries, Pisces, Taurus). So naturally, if a set of parents wanted their child to have a future in politics they would know when to try and conceive, resulting in a winter birth. More or less, I see the astrological signs serving an ancient agenda, utilized as a tool for humanity's survival and ability to thrive.

Zodiac found on Jewish Temple floor, Israel.

     Still, where do they come from and how do the signs actually work? Well for this I have another theory which I have deemed The Vibrative Relation Theory. It involves the process of imprinting and our senses. To summarize where I intend to go with this, I quote  http://lawsoftheuniverse.weebly.com/law-of-vibration.html.




     "Science reveals that everything in the manifest universe is ultimately composed of packets of energy; quantized units vibrating at specific frequencies. Quantum physicists has shown that, although matter may appear to be solid, when you look at it through a high-powered microscope so that it is broken down into its smallest components: molecules, atoms, neutrons, electrons and quanta (the smallest particles measurable), it is ultimately mostly empty space interspersed with energy. So, in essence everything is comprised of energy and empty space.  Everything that appears solid is the frequency of the vibration of the energy that makes it up. An interesting fact about this is that the denser the object, the higher the speed of vibration. At the same time, the lower the density of an object is, the lower the speed of vibration."






     With the knowledge that everything vibrates and operates at a certain frequency, we have discovered that this phenomena does in fact affect our brainwaves and their function. Ever heard of white noise therapy? Or even brown noise therapy? These are frequencies that are used to adjust mood or promote mediation. My theory is as follows:




     The sun and moon both give off frequencies of their own (radioactive, UV, sound, and electromagnetic), reaching earth between 8 to 15 minutes. Due to the Earth's axis, we have seasons, which obviously means the sun's position is constantly different each day (even slightly). My belief is that upon our body's first ability to sense these frequencies (3 to 4 weeks after initial conception), we are imprinted on by them. Or to better put it, our body associates and connects with these frequencies. This is what I believe your "Moon sign" is. However upon birth, the body is exposed to air for the first time, which cosmic frequencies travel faster and more dense through. Thus imprinting you again, but this time far stronger because your body is being hit at a much stronger and faster rate, overlapping what you sensed after conception and becoming your "Sun sign." Our body then subconsciously connects with these frequencies that are present at the time of birth (position of sun/moon, strength of vibration) resulting in attributed personality traits of the given season.

     At infancy, we experience gravity and light for the first time outside the womb. Our bodies react and adapt. The same happens as we experience the thousands of frequencies that we are exposed to after birth. The frequencies just happen to be different due to the constant movement of the Sun and Earth, resulting in a multitude of different personalities. Perhaps personality is affected by frequency due to our ability to tune "into" energy or perceive it, but for now it is not entirely known. In conclusion, this is just a theory. But it makes sense to say that, since it is already known that many things can be imprinted on us at birth, the first sense of a cosmic vibration can define what a person will be more prone to favor, or feel in life. So next time you see the zodiac signs, see them as different frequencies instead of gods and animals, ultimately helping you understand who you are and where you fit into this sliver of time we call existence.

How Skilled Are We NOW?!

This is a blog from my dear friend Seth Howell, addressing his concerns with today's world.

"Calm Seas Never Made A Skilled Sailor."

"How Skilled Are We Now?

No matter where you turn, it's nothing but the roughest seas in history. We still have the staples; More war than ever, unemployment is at a worldwide high, poverty, starvation, slavery, abuse, and imprisonment all nearly record highs. But it gets worse. Our souls are beyond corrupted. They're rotting from the core. Rape goes excused and unpunished, nearly acceptable at this point, or so the courts and judges would have you believe. Sex slavery and human trafficking became the #1 crime in the world in 2010 and hasn't been passed since. Almost 30 million people are held in this sort of predicament worldwide! Know what that means? The means that more slaves exist now than in any other point in history. More slaves than the world population in ancient Egyptian times. More slaves in the last decade than in the 300 years that trans-Atlantic slave trading was legal! But that is only indirectly why I'm writing. 
I'm taking the time to pen(write) this for one reason and that's to exemplify how lost we are, and with all that is wrong with this place, and we simply stand by, watching like it's a reality t.v. show. There are precious few who stand against it, they live and die with honor that is far far lost today. I see this generation. My generation being forced to deal with this brokenness, and I see us failing. The state this world is in may have largely not been our fault, but it is our responsibility not to perpetuate this sickness. This generation is the last chance this world has. It's the turning point. There will be several generations after us, but we determine whether they fight and struggle and eventually perish, or whether they grow and prosper. US. We are the last hope, and that honestly scares the living f**k out of me. There's no other way to put it, this generation is disgraceful for so many reason and I'm ashamed to say I'm part of it. 

SO WHY AREN'T WE BETTER??
That's a good question...
Some say 'you're only as good as your teacher'. Which falls apart fast for obvious reasons (innovation for thousands of years), but I think it's a wake principle. For example, when a large boat moves through the water, it has to work hard to power through the water. It has to disrupt the current in order to push where it wants to go. However, in its wake it's very easy to glide through the water, it's nearly effortless. On the flip-side of that, it takes great effort to break free of that wake. Any change in direction is met with even more resistance than the large boat met in order to create the wake in the first place. See the problem is, the large boat is heading for a rocky shore and has been for a while. I think it's time we finally break free of this wake before everyone suffers.
We have been sailing the roughest of seas for a while now and I know we have the skills to fair out into uncharted waters. I'm sick of excuses and I know I will be better for my grand-children's children, because they deserve the paradise I'm working to build."

-We can surpass the rest, if we only try... 

Transcribed by Mordecai
 

Denver International Airport

    Being from the Denver area myself, DIA or Denver International Airport has been a large part of my life for as long as I can remember. Seeing those tall white peaks rise above the horizon as we would make the half hour drive just to reach it, is one of the earliest memories I have actually. As a child and into my early pre-teen years, I travelled continuously. My dad had a high paying job that required him to travel every week and since it was just my mom and I, he allowed us to come with him to his many destinations. So airports and how they work, is something I am quite familiar with. This being said, DIA is not a typical airport. In this entry I will provide the facts, theories, and opinions that surround the vast conspiracy that entralls this location.

    First off are the facts. DIA is located 15 miles outside of the city of Denver and is situated on a 33,457 acre spot of land that is larger than the area of Manhattan, New York. In 1995, it replaced Stapleton Airport and had many residents upset with the fact that the airport was so far away from the city. Here is a satellite photo of DIA and its surrounding area.  

    A instant attraction for many radical conspiracy theorists (hence I say radical) is the actual shape of the airport, which is that of a swastika. Continuing on, the airport cost 4.8 billion to construct and for those who helped build it, a "hush hush" rule was implemented. Meaning those who worked on the airport were told not to talk about their jobs, or the airport itself outside of work. The most famous account of this is from Philip Schneider, a structural engineer who worked on the underground bases at Area 51 as well as Deluce, New Mexico. Mr. Schneider claimed that he worked on an underground base that lies eight levels deep (roughly 3 miles) beneath the entire airport and then was asked to keep his silence. This underground base, he said, was intended to be used as a holding facility for a large mass of people. Philip Schneider also made claims about the underground base at DIA being built for the intention of housing aliens. Later, he mentioned its reasoning being global oppression. Photographic and geographic evidence prove that there is an underground facility. For example, there are vents placed around the 33,000 acre area, as well as large tunnel entrances miles away from the airport that no one has explained. For many people, these are valid reasons for the hefty cost of the construction, the secrecy surrounding it, and the 33,000 acre location outside of the city. Now DIA does have an underground facility. This is proven by the underground tramline that connects the three terminals to each other. Any traveller that arrives at the airport must take the tram to the baggage claim. Now having taken that tram for a good 19 years of my life, I can tell you that it is creepier than it sounds. Huge doors and large vats pass by as you travel through the tunnel. The atmosphere is just one of gloom and mystery. To make an odd tale even more odd, Philip Schneider died shortly after releasing these claims about the airport and its secrets. He was strangled and ruled a suicide. Remember... question everything.

Inside the DIA tramline tunnel

    Another oddity about this airport is the artwork that is on display in the baggage claim. Painted by Leo Tanguma, the artworks depict what looks like ethnic cleansing, governmental oppression, utopian living, and secret illuminati "code" for future world dominance. This all, you will have to decide for yourself. I myself, still find this odd. 

    There is also an odd masonic capstone in the main concourse that says the airport belongs to the "New World Airport Commission." If you read closely, it says there is a time capsule beneath the stone to be opened in 2094. Strange? The sheer fact that the masons have this large of a presence here, outside their lodges, raises eyebrows. 

    Lastly, there is a large statue of a blue bronco that welcomes drivers to the airport. It's eyes are red and its demeanor aggressive in nature. Some say that it represents one of the horseman of the apocalypse disguised as a Denver Bronco reference. Regardless of the reason, the statue is still ominous. 

    In conclusion, one thing can be said. There is more to this airport than meets the eye. Whether that it be a FEMA camp intended for the mass execution of unfaithful citizens, an alien experimentation base, or merely a bunker for the global elite to come to for protection. It is something. For the skeptics, this could be nothing more than a bunker for the president, or a housing for food if the ever is a global catastrophe. All in all, it is an intriguing location. 

- Tim

Evolution: Illogical

Many people are taken away by the Theory of Evolution, claiming that it makes sense, and that it's more reasonable than believing in a Divine Creator. They claim that there's no proof of a God of any sort, and that we are just a product, of a continuous process that implies un-caused events, infinite temporal regression, spontaneous generation, and a lot more. But the truth is, there is no justifiable proof of evolution, macro at least. Nothing empirical or reasonable. At least the claims of Creationism and Divine Intervention can be quantified, to a point and it can most definitely be reasoned as well.

But I'm not gonna post about religious dogma, or force anyone to believe in God. I'm merely showing why evolution is false, and why everything pretty much leads to a “higher intelligence”. Whatever one may believe God maybe, they'd have to admit that there's SOMETHING eternal, and that evolution is mostly just a fallacy used to deny or to take away from whatever the “divine” may be. But whatever that higher intelligence may be is a discussion for maybe for a different time.

Evolution: Illogical

Like I stated before, this isn't an attempt to convert anyone, but to reveal the hideously obvious falsities in the Evolutionary Theory. A lot of these facts I have held on to from a younger age, but I also learned a lot from a book called “In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood” by Walt Brown. I believe it's a good read for anyone. I will briefly cover some of the topics (just a few favorite of mine) and arguments I have personally used, and more that I have learned form the book (which has done an even better job of explaining some points than I have lol). And this is just me bringing up arguments for the sake of discussion and learning. And these are points simply acknowledging the illegitimacy of evolution using simple arguments. Lets get started:

-Law of Bio-genesis: Now, its safe to say that most of us can agree that smaller processes like microevolution are possible. All it involves is small alterations in chemicals, or changes in shape, size, color, etc, but no increase in complexity. Macroevolution is the side that introduces drastic change in complexity; organs or species. Spontaneous Generation is pretty the emergence of life, from nonliving matter, which defies all observations confirming life comes from life (Law of Bio-genesis) ^(Brown). Macroevolution is unobserved and no observable species contain any evidence of it.

-Complex Organs: We've heard this argument many times in this topic, but think about it, there isn't any reason to believe that mutation or any natural process could produce new organ such as the eye, ear, or brain. I mean, common! The brain contains 10¹⁴ or a hundred thousand billion, electrical connections in your adult life. The heart is a feat of ingenuity, operating about 75 years without rest, lubrication, or maintenance (generally).

-Fully Developed Organs: This seems to be something (among many things) that a lot of people tend to miss. Umm...oh yea! All species are appear fully developed, not partially, as macroevolution inadvertently suggests. No examples of half-developed legs, feathers, eyes, skin, vessels, or whatever are shown. If major parts of a certain species has to change something anatomically or physiologically over time, then that species might die off or devolve from a conflict of transformation over a loooooong period of time, long before that part (organ, skin, wings, etc..) becomes beneficial.

-Altruism: Many organisms, humans included, would risk their safety and sometimes lives to save another, even if the other is of a different species ^(Brown). This spits rights in the face natural selection, which states that selfish, aggressive, and possibly cheating-like behavior should be adopted or innate for survival. But risky behavior that only benefits the other tends to prevent the passing of genes, due to NON-selfish behavior. Altruism contradicts evolution, and it is shown ^(Brown).

-Codes an Programs: We have learned that codes are made by intelligence, not by chance or natural processes. “A code is a SET OF RULES for converting information from one useful form to another” ^(Brown), kind of like Morse Code or Braille. The genetic material that controls the physical processes for all life is CODED INFORMATION, and it's accompanied by complex translation, transmission, and duplication systems, that make genetic material useful and continuing all forms of life ^(Brown). Supernatural processes had to take place for such elaborate work. It should be also know that no natural processes have been shown to produce a program, which is a planned sequence of steps to accomplish something. Think of computer programs, those don't just “happen”. Some higher intelligence programmed whatever it was that had to be done using computer faculties FOR A REASON. These programs, like all other programs, were developed by a higher intelligence, I mean, that's what SCIENCE will tell you anyways.

Last point I'm going to talk about is Vestigial Organs, which are organs that pretty much have little to no use. Just because a function of an organ is unknown doesn't mean that they are vestiges of organs that were inherited from evolutionary ancestors ^(Brown). Today, we know at LEAST some function of all the organs that have been discovered. Think of the human appendix, which was once thought as a useless remainder from our evolutionary past. But, we know now that it plays a role in antibody production and protects part of the intestines from infection ^(Brown). Well now! And check this out, a person with their appendix removed is more like to get leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, cancer of the colon and of the ovaries ^(Brown). So pretty much, the absence of true vestigial organs implies that evolution, never happened.

SO! Those are just a few arguments I've learned and thought about intensely while contemplating that validity of Evolution. I refuse to believe in something that makes no sense, and that has been drastically been over-exaggerated and mistranslated, probably more times than most religions. So why believe it? No real data, falsified records, theories that have been dismissed by some of the very theorists who created them, the signs pointing to higher intelligence. C'mon! It's time to open your mind and think about it!

-Mordecai

Reference:

Brown, Walt. In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood. !st Edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Center for Scientific Creation, 1995. 5-9. Print.

Ontological Empiricism

    Remember that episode of Family Guy when Peter Griffin made a sarcastic reference about something being as “fun” as a lecture on Ontological Empiricism, and then he was confused?

Well, so was I, and I'm sure your are too. I decided to dabble in a little research on the topic and while ago. Later, I ended up getting a bit more detail from a class I took a year ago as well.

Let me break it down for ya':

Ontology: Something pertaining to being, or existence. 

Empirical: Of, or relating to the senses. Something that can be experiences through one of the five senses. 

Empiricism: The epistemological study that all knowledge is derived from the senses, tending to lack in rational conclusion. 

Example: The sun, it looks like it rises when in reality, the earth rotates on a tilt, giving the impression that the sun is rising. Though we are seeing it, (it's empirical), it's not true. You can't justify existence and being purely on observation and the senses, because those things change. 

    So when we talk about Ontological Empiricism, what are we inferring? I'll tell you; existence (being) through the senses. Pretty much saying, we only exist (or are aware of it and make sense of it) because we experience it (through touch, taste, smell, etc...), and it kind of falls into the realm of the philosophical movements of Pragmatism, Empiricism, and Existentialism. And although O.E. (Ontological Empiricism for short) has some solid truth, my struggle with it is that it doesn't adhere fully to reason. We all know that stuff exists because we experience it, but experience isn't always objective. People experience and interpret things very differently, which doesn't make for a solid foundation of the nature of our existence and inception. I fail to see it as a true, justified belief, which is composed of real knowledge.  

    Well, that's all I can pull from my head right now, but if you want to know more, or if you feel that I'm missing something, then contact me!

-Mordecai