Evolution: Illogical

Many people are taken away by the Theory of Evolution, claiming that it makes sense, and that it's more reasonable than believing in a Divine Creator. They claim that there's no proof of a God of any sort, and that we are just a product, of a continuous process that implies un-caused events, infinite temporal regression, spontaneous generation, and a lot more. But the truth is, there is no justifiable proof of evolution, macro at least. Nothing empirical or reasonable. At least the claims of Creationism and Divine Intervention can be quantified, to a point and it can most definitely be reasoned as well.

But I'm not gonna post about religious dogma, or force anyone to believe in God. I'm merely showing why evolution is false, and why everything pretty much leads to a “higher intelligence”. Whatever one may believe God maybe, they'd have to admit that there's SOMETHING eternal, and that evolution is mostly just a fallacy used to deny or to take away from whatever the “divine” may be. But whatever that higher intelligence may be is a discussion for maybe for a different time.

Evolution: Illogical

Like I stated before, this isn't an attempt to convert anyone, but to reveal the hideously obvious falsities in the Evolutionary Theory. A lot of these facts I have held on to from a younger age, but I also learned a lot from a book called “In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood” by Walt Brown. I believe it's a good read for anyone. I will briefly cover some of the topics (just a few favorite of mine) and arguments I have personally used, and more that I have learned form the book (which has done an even better job of explaining some points than I have lol). And this is just me bringing up arguments for the sake of discussion and learning. And these are points simply acknowledging the illegitimacy of evolution using simple arguments. Lets get started:

-Law of Bio-genesis: Now, its safe to say that most of us can agree that smaller processes like microevolution are possible. All it involves is small alterations in chemicals, or changes in shape, size, color, etc, but no increase in complexity. Macroevolution is the side that introduces drastic change in complexity; organs or species. Spontaneous Generation is pretty the emergence of life, from nonliving matter, which defies all observations confirming life comes from life (Law of Bio-genesis) ^(Brown). Macroevolution is unobserved and no observable species contain any evidence of it.

-Complex Organs: We've heard this argument many times in this topic, but think about it, there isn't any reason to believe that mutation or any natural process could produce new organ such as the eye, ear, or brain. I mean, common! The brain contains 10¹⁴ or a hundred thousand billion, electrical connections in your adult life. The heart is a feat of ingenuity, operating about 75 years without rest, lubrication, or maintenance (generally).

-Fully Developed Organs: This seems to be something (among many things) that a lot of people tend to miss. Umm...oh yea! All species are appear fully developed, not partially, as macroevolution inadvertently suggests. No examples of half-developed legs, feathers, eyes, skin, vessels, or whatever are shown. If major parts of a certain species has to change something anatomically or physiologically over time, then that species might die off or devolve from a conflict of transformation over a loooooong period of time, long before that part (organ, skin, wings, etc..) becomes beneficial.

-Altruism: Many organisms, humans included, would risk their safety and sometimes lives to save another, even if the other is of a different species ^(Brown). This spits rights in the face natural selection, which states that selfish, aggressive, and possibly cheating-like behavior should be adopted or innate for survival. But risky behavior that only benefits the other tends to prevent the passing of genes, due to NON-selfish behavior. Altruism contradicts evolution, and it is shown ^(Brown).

-Codes an Programs: We have learned that codes are made by intelligence, not by chance or natural processes. “A code is a SET OF RULES for converting information from one useful form to another” ^(Brown), kind of like Morse Code or Braille. The genetic material that controls the physical processes for all life is CODED INFORMATION, and it's accompanied by complex translation, transmission, and duplication systems, that make genetic material useful and continuing all forms of life ^(Brown). Supernatural processes had to take place for such elaborate work. It should be also know that no natural processes have been shown to produce a program, which is a planned sequence of steps to accomplish something. Think of computer programs, those don't just “happen”. Some higher intelligence programmed whatever it was that had to be done using computer faculties FOR A REASON. These programs, like all other programs, were developed by a higher intelligence, I mean, that's what SCIENCE will tell you anyways.

Last point I'm going to talk about is Vestigial Organs, which are organs that pretty much have little to no use. Just because a function of an organ is unknown doesn't mean that they are vestiges of organs that were inherited from evolutionary ancestors ^(Brown). Today, we know at LEAST some function of all the organs that have been discovered. Think of the human appendix, which was once thought as a useless remainder from our evolutionary past. But, we know now that it plays a role in antibody production and protects part of the intestines from infection ^(Brown). Well now! And check this out, a person with their appendix removed is more like to get leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, cancer of the colon and of the ovaries ^(Brown). So pretty much, the absence of true vestigial organs implies that evolution, never happened.

SO! Those are just a few arguments I've learned and thought about intensely while contemplating that validity of Evolution. I refuse to believe in something that makes no sense, and that has been drastically been over-exaggerated and mistranslated, probably more times than most religions. So why believe it? No real data, falsified records, theories that have been dismissed by some of the very theorists who created them, the signs pointing to higher intelligence. C'mon! It's time to open your mind and think about it!

-Mordecai

Reference:

Brown, Walt. In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood. !st Edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Center for Scientific Creation, 1995. 5-9. Print.