Evolution: Illogical
Many
people are taken away by the Theory of Evolution, claiming that it
makes sense, and that it's more reasonable than believing in a Divine
Creator. They claim that there's no proof of a God of any sort, and
that we are just a product, of a continuous process that implies
un-caused events, infinite temporal regression, spontaneous
generation, and a lot more. But the truth is, there is no justifiable
proof of evolution, macro at least. Nothing empirical or reasonable.
At least the claims of Creationism and Divine Intervention can be
quantified, to a point and it can most definitely be reasoned as
well.
But I'm
not gonna post about religious dogma, or force anyone to believe in
God. I'm merely showing why evolution is false, and why everything
pretty much leads to a “higher intelligence”. Whatever one may
believe God maybe, they'd have to admit that there's SOMETHING
eternal, and that evolution is mostly just a fallacy used to deny or
to take away from whatever the “divine” may be. But whatever that
higher intelligence may be is a discussion for maybe for a different
time.
Evolution:
Illogical
Like I stated before, this isn't an attempt to convert anyone, but to
reveal the hideously obvious falsities in the Evolutionary Theory. A
lot of these facts I have held on to from a younger age, but I also
learned a lot from a book called “In The Beginning: Compelling
Evidence for Creation and the Flood” by Walt Brown. I believe it's
a good read for anyone. I will briefly cover some of the topics (just
a few favorite of mine) and arguments I have personally used, and
more that I have learned form the book (which has done an even better
job of explaining some points than I have lol). And this is just me
bringing up arguments for the sake of discussion and learning. And
these are points simply acknowledging the illegitimacy of evolution
using simple arguments. Lets get started:
-Law
of Bio-genesis: Now, its safe
to say that most of us can agree that smaller processes like
microevolution are
possible. All it involves is small alterations in chemicals, or
changes in shape, size, color, etc, but no increase in complexity.
Macroevolution is the
side that introduces drastic change in complexity; organs or species.
Spontaneous Generation is pretty the emergence of life, from
nonliving matter, which defies all observations confirming life comes
from life (Law of Bio-genesis) (Brown).
Macroevolution is unobserved and no observable species contain any
evidence of it.
-Complex
Organs: We've heard this
argument many times in this topic, but think about it, there isn't
any reason to believe that mutation or any natural process could
produce new organ such as the eye, ear, or brain. I mean, common! The
brain contains 1014 or
a hundred thousand billion, electrical connections in your adult
life. The heart is a feat of ingenuity, operating about 75 years
without rest, lubrication, or maintenance (generally).
-Fully
Developed Organs: This seems to
be something (among many things) that a lot of people tend to miss.
Umm...oh yea! All species are appear fully developed, not partially,
as macroevolution inadvertently suggests. No examples of
half-developed legs, feathers, eyes, skin, vessels, or whatever are
shown. If major parts of a certain species has to change something
anatomically or physiologically over time, then that species might
die off or devolve from a conflict of transformation over a loooooong
period of time, long before that part (organ, skin, wings, etc..)
becomes beneficial.
-Altruism:
Many organisms, humans
included, would risk their safety and sometimes lives to save
another, even if the other is of a different species
(Brown). This spits
rights in the face natural selection, which states that selfish,
aggressive, and possibly cheating-like behavior should be adopted or
innate for survival. But risky behavior that only benefits the other
tends to prevent the passing of genes, due to NON-selfish
behavior. Altruism contradicts evolution, and it is shown (Brown).
-Codes
an Programs: We have learned
that codes are made by intelligence, not by chance or natural
processes. “A code is a SET OF RULES for converting information
from one useful form to another” (Brown),
kind of like Morse Code or Braille. The genetic material that
controls the physical processes for all life is CODED INFORMATION,
and it's accompanied by complex translation, transmission, and
duplication systems, that make genetic material useful and continuing
all forms of life (Brown).
Supernatural processes had to take place for such elaborate work. It
should be also know that no natural processes have been shown to
produce a program, which is a planned sequence of steps to accomplish
something. Think of computer programs, those don't just “happen”.
Some higher intelligence programmed whatever it was that had to be
done using computer faculties FOR A REASON. These programs, like all
other programs, were developed by a higher intelligence, I mean,
that's what SCIENCE will tell you anyways.
Last
point I'm going to talk about is Vestigial Organs,
which are organs that pretty much have little to no use. Just because
a function of an organ is unknown doesn't mean that they are vestiges
of organs that were inherited from evolutionary ancestors (Brown).
Today, we know at LEAST some function of all the organs that have
been discovered. Think of the human appendix, which was once thought
as a useless remainder from our evolutionary past. But, we know now
that it plays a role in antibody production and protects part of the
intestines from infection (Brown).
Well now! And check this out, a person with their appendix removed is
more like to get leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, cancer of the colon and
of the ovaries (Brown).
So pretty much, the absence of true vestigial organs implies that
evolution, never happened.
SO!
Those are just a few arguments I've learned and thought about
intensely while contemplating that validity of Evolution. I refuse to
believe in something that makes no sense, and that has been
drastically been over-exaggerated and mistranslated, probably more
times than most religions. So why believe it? No real data, falsified
records, theories that have been dismissed by some of the very
theorists who created them, the signs pointing to higher
intelligence. C'mon! It's time to open your mind and think about it!
-Mordecai
Reference:
Brown,
Walt. In The Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the
Flood. !st Edition. Phoenix, Arizona: Center for Scientific
Creation, 1995. 5-9. Print.